Abstract
Despite the Supreme Court ruling on the matter in July 2023, the correct test for police misconduct for use of force (the use of force test) in England and Wales remains contested. This article explores how the largely subjective criminal law test preferred by police stakeholders is inconsistent with addressing the institutional racism within the Metropolitan Police highlighted in the Casey Review. In doing so, it makes a novel contribution to police accountability debates by developing a new analytical framework which allows arguments concerning police accountability processes to be more clearly articulated and assessed. The framework envisages three axes of accountability. The Conduct Axis relates to the actual levels of force used against citizens. The Cultural Axis concerns the extent to which police accountability processes provide meaningful oversight of police managers and professional standards departments, while the Constitutional Axis is engaged with the balance of power at the various parts of the police accountability system. Plotting the relative impact of more subjective or objective use of force tests along each Axis allows clarity of debate concerning the consequences of the preferred test and thereby highlights the mitigation necessary in relation to the negative consequences of a choice in either direction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Legal Studies |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 21 Oct 2025 |
Keywords
- Police use of force, Police Accountability, Casey Review, Institutional Racism, Godwin and Fulford Review ice Insitutional raciasm