TY - JOUR
T1 - The challenge of transforming the diagnostic system of personality disorders
AU - Herpertz, Sabine C.
AU - Huprich, Steven K.
AU - Bohus, Martin
AU - Chanen, Andrew
AU - Goodman, Marianne
AU - Mehlum, Lars
AU - Moran, Paul
AU - Newton-Howes, Giles
AU - Scott, Lori
AU - Sharp, Carla
PY - 2017/10/1
Y1 - 2017/10/1
N2 - While the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder (PD) diagnosis allows the field to systematically compare categorical and dimensional classifications, the ICD-11 proposal suggests a radical change by restricting the classification of PDs to one category, deleting all specific types, basing clinical service provision exclusively upon a severity dimension, and restricting trait domains to secondary qualifiers without defining cutoff points. This article reflects broad international agreement about the state of PD diagnosis. It is argued that diagnosis according to the ICD-11 proposal is based on broad, potentially stigmatizing descriptions of impaired functioning and ignores much of the impressive body of research and treatment guidelines that have advanced the care of adults and adolescents with borderline and other PDs. Before radically changing classification, which highly impacts the provision of health care, head-to-head field trials coupled with the views of patients as well as thorough debate among scientists are urgently needed.
AB - While the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder (PD) diagnosis allows the field to systematically compare categorical and dimensional classifications, the ICD-11 proposal suggests a radical change by restricting the classification of PDs to one category, deleting all specific types, basing clinical service provision exclusively upon a severity dimension, and restricting trait domains to secondary qualifiers without defining cutoff points. This article reflects broad international agreement about the state of PD diagnosis. It is argued that diagnosis according to the ICD-11 proposal is based on broad, potentially stigmatizing descriptions of impaired functioning and ignores much of the impressive body of research and treatment guidelines that have advanced the care of adults and adolescents with borderline and other PDs. Before radically changing classification, which highly impacts the provision of health care, head-to-head field trials coupled with the views of patients as well as thorough debate among scientists are urgently needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031497086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_338
DO - 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_338
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 28910213
AN - SCOPUS:85031497086
SN - 0885-579X
VL - 31
SP - 577
EP - 589
JO - Journal of Personality Disorders
JF - Journal of Personality Disorders
IS - 5
ER -