Abstract
The Inquiry into the death of Victoria Climbié was portrayed as the most wide ranging Inquiry into failure to protect a child. It was instrumental in the development of the new safeguarding agenda and joined-up children's services in the Children Act 2004. Both its process and outcome appear to fit with New Labour's agenda for joined-up government. A social constructionist analysis reveals it as a narrower project which ignored key issues and failed to make links between government policy, the law and local authority action. Three issues 1) parental responsibility, 2) treating intra-family child abuse as a crime and 3) local authorities' responsibilities for family support exemplify the Inquiry's restrictive approach and the impossibility of joined-up services if central government seeks to retain authority without taking responsibility. Despite its success in changing policy, the Climbié Report shows again the inadequacy of such Inquiries as a basis for reform.
| Translated title of the contribution | The Climbié Inquiry - context and critique |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 221 - 243 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Journal of Law and Society |
| Volume | 33 (2) |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2006 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher: BlackwellUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Climbié Inquiry - context and critique'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver