Abstract
Recent insights from cognitive science have reshaped our understanding of the reliability of eyewitness memory. Many believe that eyewitness memory is unreliable, but a better way to think is that eyewitness memory, like other kinds of forensic evidence, can be contaminated. Because contaminated evidence yields unreliable results, the focus should be placed on testing uncontaminated memory evidence collected early in a police investigation. The recent application of theories, principles, and methods from cognitive science has revealed that both in the lab and in the real world, the first test of uncontaminated memory provides much more reliable information than previously thought. Moreover, and critically, this reliable but often-ignored evidence frequently points in the direction of a convicted defendant’s innocence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 655-668 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Trends in Cognitive Sciences |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 27 Feb 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 27 Feb 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 The Author(s)
Research Groups and Themes
- Mind and Brain (Psychological Science)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The cognitive science of eyewitness memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver