The consistency of RAE outcomes in the social sciences: A quantitative comparison of social policy and cognate subjects in the RAE 2001

SD McKay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

Abstract

In the RAE 2001, widely differing proportions of staff were judged internationally excellent in different academic subjects. This has important financial and other implications, and in 2008 a hierarchical structure will aim to increase consistency. We look at those subjects that will be part of a super-unit with social policy in 2008, and consider what objective rationale may explain the wide differences in ratings in 2001. A quantitative analysis found no such rationale, indeed some variations appear perverse. This highlights the need for greater consistency of judgements, perhaps steered by a ‘super-panel’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1 - 13
Number of pages13
JournalSocial Policy and Society
Volume5 (1)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Bibliographical note

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The consistency of RAE outcomes in the social sciences: A quantitative comparison of social policy and cognate subjects in the RAE 2001'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this