The Covid-19 Clinician Cohort (CoCCo) Study: empirically grounded recommendations for forward-facing psychological care of frontline doctors

Jo Daniels; Jenny  Ingram; Anna S Pease; Elaine Wainwright; Kate E Beckett; Lali Iyadurai; Edward W Carlton

doi:10.3390/ijerph18189675

The Covid-19 Clinician Cohort (CoCCo) Study: empirically grounded recommendations for forward-facing psychological care of frontline doctors

Jo Daniels^*, Jenny Ingram, Anna S Pease, Elaine Wainwright, Kate E Beckett, Lali Iyadurai, Edward W Carlton

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study aimed to develop empirically grounded recommendations and a coherent model of psychological care derived from the experiences and psychological care needs of COVID-19 frontline doctors, using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Participants were UK frontline doctors specialising in Emergency Medicine, Anaesthetics, or Intensive Care (n = 31) purposively sampled for maximum variation on gender, specialty, ethnicity, and trauma-related distress; most worked in ICU during the pandemic (71%). Four themes were derived: (1) ‘coping strategies’, participants used many, including exercise, mindfulness, and “wait until it gets really bad”; (2) ‘sources of support’, participants valued embedded psychological support, digital services, and informal conversations with colleagues or family, though there was little opportunity; (3) ‘organisational influences on wellbeing’, participants reported a love–hate relationship for concepts like ‘wellbeing’, seen as important but insulting when basic workplace needs were unmet; (4) ‘improving engagement with support’, analysis suggests we must reduce physical and psychological barriers to access and encourage leaders to model psychologically supportive behaviours. Doctors’ frontline COVID-19 working experiences shine a ‘spotlight’ on pre-existing problems such as lack of physical resources and access to psychological care. Empirically grounded recommendations and a model of incremental psychological care are presented for use in clinical services.

Original language	English
Article number	9675
Number of pages	18
Journal	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume	18
Issue number	18
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189675
Publication status	Published - 14 Sep 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding: This research has been carried out through funding by the Southmead Hospital Charity Research Fund (Ref: 4922) and sponsored by North Bristol NHS trust. The funders had no role in considering the study design or in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords

COVID-19
frontline workers
healthcare workers
qualitative research
trauma
psychological support
occupational health
guidelines

Access to Document

10.3390/ijerph18189675

Full-text PDF (final published version)
This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via MDPI at https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189675 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
Final published version, 815 KBLicence: CC BY

Handle.net

Persistent link

Embargoed Document

Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)
Accepted author manuscript, 685 KB
Request copy

Cite this

Daniels, J., Ingram, J., Pease, A. S., Wainwright, E., Beckett, K. E., Iyadurai, L., & Carlton, E. W. (2021). The Covid-19 Clinician Cohort (CoCCo) Study: empirically grounded recommendations for forward-facing psychological care of frontline doctors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), [9675]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189675

@article{d53b5d8508004aed8253d1921a8aa90f,

title = "The Covid-19 Clinician Cohort (CoCCo) Study: empirically grounded recommendations for forward-facing psychological care of frontline doctors",

abstract = "This study aimed to develop empirically grounded recommendations and a coherent model of psychological care derived from the experiences and psychological care needs of COVID-19 frontline doctors, using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Participants were UK frontline doctors specialising in Emergency Medicine, Anaesthetics, or Intensive Care (n = 31) purposively sampled for maximum variation on gender, specialty, ethnicity, and trauma-related distress; most worked in ICU during the pandemic (71%). Four themes were derived: (1) {\textquoteleft}coping strategies{\textquoteright}, participants used many, including exercise, mindfulness, and “wait until it gets really bad”; (2) {\textquoteleft}sources of support{\textquoteright}, participants valued embedded psychological support, digital services, and informal conversations with colleagues or family, though there was little opportunity; (3) {\textquoteleft}organisational influences on wellbeing{\textquoteright}, participants reported a love–hate relationship for concepts like {\textquoteleft}wellbeing{\textquoteright}, seen as important but insulting when basic workplace needs were unmet; (4) {\textquoteleft}improving engagement with support{\textquoteright}, analysis suggests we must reduce physical and psychological barriers to access and encourage leaders to model psychologically supportive behaviours. Doctors{\textquoteright} frontline COVID-19 working experiences shine a {\textquoteleft}spotlight{\textquoteright} on pre-existing problems such as lack of physical resources and access to psychological care. Empirically grounded recommendations and a model of incremental psychological care are presented for use in clinical services.",

keywords = "COVID-19, frontline workers, healthcare workers, qualitative research, trauma, psychological support, occupational health, guidelines",

author = "Jo Daniels and Jenny Ingram and Pease, {Anna S} and Elaine Wainwright and Beckett, {Kate E} and Lali Iyadurai and Carlton, {Edward W}",

note = "Funding Information: Funding: This research has been carried out through funding by the Southmead Hospital Charity Research Fund (Ref: 4922) and sponsored by North Bristol NHS trust. The funders had no role in considering the study design or in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

day = "14",

doi = "10.3390/ijerph18189675",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",

issn = "1661-7827",

publisher = "MDPI AG",

number = "18",

}

The Covid-19 Clinician Cohort (CoCCo) Study : empirically grounded recommendations for forward-facing psychological care of frontline doctors. / Daniels, Jo; Ingram, Jenny ; Pease, Anna S et al.

In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 18, 9675, 14.09.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Covid-19 Clinician Cohort (CoCCo) Study

T2 - empirically grounded recommendations for forward-facing psychological care of frontline doctors

AU - Daniels, Jo

AU - Ingram, Jenny

AU - Pease, Anna S

AU - Wainwright, Elaine

AU - Beckett, Kate E

AU - Iyadurai, Lali

AU - Carlton, Edward W

N1 - Funding Information: Funding: This research has been carried out through funding by the Southmead Hospital Charity Research Fund (Ref: 4922) and sponsored by North Bristol NHS trust. The funders had no role in considering the study design or in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

PY - 2021/9/14

Y1 - 2021/9/14

N2 - This study aimed to develop empirically grounded recommendations and a coherent model of psychological care derived from the experiences and psychological care needs of COVID-19 frontline doctors, using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Participants were UK frontline doctors specialising in Emergency Medicine, Anaesthetics, or Intensive Care (n = 31) purposively sampled for maximum variation on gender, specialty, ethnicity, and trauma-related distress; most worked in ICU during the pandemic (71%). Four themes were derived: (1) ‘coping strategies’, participants used many, including exercise, mindfulness, and “wait until it gets really bad”; (2) ‘sources of support’, participants valued embedded psychological support, digital services, and informal conversations with colleagues or family, though there was little opportunity; (3) ‘organisational influences on wellbeing’, participants reported a love–hate relationship for concepts like ‘wellbeing’, seen as important but insulting when basic workplace needs were unmet; (4) ‘improving engagement with support’, analysis suggests we must reduce physical and psychological barriers to access and encourage leaders to model psychologically supportive behaviours. Doctors’ frontline COVID-19 working experiences shine a ‘spotlight’ on pre-existing problems such as lack of physical resources and access to psychological care. Empirically grounded recommendations and a model of incremental psychological care are presented for use in clinical services.

AB - This study aimed to develop empirically grounded recommendations and a coherent model of psychological care derived from the experiences and psychological care needs of COVID-19 frontline doctors, using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Participants were UK frontline doctors specialising in Emergency Medicine, Anaesthetics, or Intensive Care (n = 31) purposively sampled for maximum variation on gender, specialty, ethnicity, and trauma-related distress; most worked in ICU during the pandemic (71%). Four themes were derived: (1) ‘coping strategies’, participants used many, including exercise, mindfulness, and “wait until it gets really bad”; (2) ‘sources of support’, participants valued embedded psychological support, digital services, and informal conversations with colleagues or family, though there was little opportunity; (3) ‘organisational influences on wellbeing’, participants reported a love–hate relationship for concepts like ‘wellbeing’, seen as important but insulting when basic workplace needs were unmet; (4) ‘improving engagement with support’, analysis suggests we must reduce physical and psychological barriers to access and encourage leaders to model psychologically supportive behaviours. Doctors’ frontline COVID-19 working experiences shine a ‘spotlight’ on pre-existing problems such as lack of physical resources and access to psychological care. Empirically grounded recommendations and a model of incremental psychological care are presented for use in clinical services.

KW - COVID-19

KW - frontline workers

KW - healthcare workers

KW - qualitative research

KW - trauma

KW - psychological support

KW - occupational health

KW - guidelines

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph18189675

DO - 10.3390/ijerph18189675

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 34574598

VL - 18

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 18

M1 - 9675

ER -

The Covid-19 Clinician Cohort (CoCCo) Study: empirically grounded recommendations for forward-facing psychological care of frontline doctors

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this