Abstract
Introducing new national examinations is a complex, multi-agency policy implementation. However, there have been some high-profile problems in examination systems in recent years. This research investigated what 10 UK managers involved in the process thought were the main problems. Time pressures were recognised as a serious problem by the managers, as well as the politically driven nature of the reform. It is argued that network management explains the lack of high-profile individual leaders, the delegation issues, the apparent lack of traditional management skills, the low level of planning and monitoring, the absence of scoping, a professionalist approach, the lack of separation between policy and implementation and the fact that managers could not specify from the outset what needed to be done for a new round of examination developments. Inter-agency power relationships accounted for lack of negotiation of timescales. Recommendations are made for construction of a qualification development blueprint, scoping of resources, appraisal of the human resources shortage in the UK assessment sector and better stakeholder management of the qualification development policy community by government.
| Translated title of the contribution | The dearth of managerialism in the implementation of national assessment policy |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 55 - 81 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | Journal of Education Policy |
| Volume | 24 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2009 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher: Taylor & FrancisFingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The dearth of managerialism in the implementation of national assessment policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver