Abstract
Comparative and international education (CIE) claims to be an interdisciplinary field embracing a diversity in methodologies and theoretical perspectives. Over the years, there has been an expansion in the range of theoretical perspectives employed in scholarship, as new scholars bring with them interests, expertise and positionalities. Our analysis maps the development of theoretical perspectives in doctoral theses in CIE at North American universities since 1990. We find that theory has changed considerably in this time, with a greater emphasis on critical perspectives and standpoint theories and a declining interest in economically focused perspectives. We also note that the role of doctoral advisors is primarily in terms of theoretical perspective, rather than context or methodology. These findings improve our understanding of the field in North America and potentially hold relevance to scholarship in other parts of the world.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 566-582 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Research in Comparative and International Education |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 6 Jul 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 6 Jul 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2022.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The development of theory in comparative and international education: An analysis of doctoral theses at North American universities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver