Skip to content

The Economies and Diseconomies of Industrial Clustering: Multinational Enterprises versus Uninational Enterprises

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages33
JournalManagement International Review
Early online date4 Sep 2018
DateAccepted/In press - 10 Jul 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 4 Sep 2018


This study’s objective is to compare cluster economies and diseconomies for multinational enterprises (MNEs) and uninational enterprises (UNEs) within the London financial services cluster. In contrast to the implicit assumption of the cluster participation literature that the economies and diseconomies of clusters are valued similarly by all firms, we find that economies relating to social capital and labour market pooling are equally important to MNEs and UNEs, economies relating to local competition and diseconomies relating to congestion costs are more important to MNEs than to UNEs, and economies relating to the reputational effects of locating in a world-leading cluster and access to specialised suppliers are more important to UNEs than to MNEs. That MNEs and UNEs do not experience cluster economies and diseconomies in the same way indicates that both cluster participation theory and international business theory need augmentation to recognise that cluster incumbents benefit and suffer from cluster membership differently.
Keywords: Clusters; Location; FDI; MNEs; UNEs; Financial Services.
JEL classification codes: F2, L2, 03, R3

    Structured keywords

  • MGMT International Business Management and Strategy

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Springer at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 875 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups