Skip to content

The effect of entry and retention in opioid agonist treatment on contact with the criminal justice system among opioid-dependent people: a retrospective cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e334-e342
Number of pages9
JournalLancet Public Health
Volume4
Issue number7
Early online date11 Jun 2019
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 12 Apr 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 11 Jun 2019
DatePublished (current) - 1 Jul 2019

Abstract

Background: Evidence on the effectiveness of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in reducing crime is mixed. We evaluated the impact of OAT on crime in terms of delaying time to first charge and reducing overall charge rates, as well as the relationship between OAT retention and overall charge rates.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 10,744 new OAT entrants between 2004-2010 in New South Wales, Australia, linked to data on charges, incarceration and mortality to the end of 2011. Time-dependent OAT exposure was modelled using Cox proportional hazards models (time to first charge) and Anderson-Gill intensity models (total charge-days). Retention in OAT was modelled using two features of treatment engagement - number of OAT episodes and proportion of follow-up in OAT (presented in quartile groupings: lowest, low-mid, low-high, highest) using zero-inflated negative binomial regression (total charges). All models were adjusted for sociodemographic, criminographic and treatment-related variables.

Findings: Overall, 5,751 (53.5%) people were charged with an offence. In adjusted analyses, OAT was associated with an initial benefit in delaying the time to first charge (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.43, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.33-0.55) and reducing total charge-days (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.52), however, these protective effects decayed over time. Total charge rates were higher as the number of OAT episodes increased (Incident Rate Ratio (IRR) 1.13, 95% CI 1.11-1.15), and where relatively lower proportions of time were spent in OAT [IRR among lowest three quartiles ranged from 1.11 (95% CI 1.02-1.21) to 1.22 (95% CI 1.121-1.33)].

Interpretation: OAT is associated with a significant reduction in overall charge rates and is more protective as treatment engagement increases. Maximising treatment retention is critical to achieving long-term health and social benefits of OAT.

    Research areas

  • crime, prisons, Opioid substitution treatment, opiod-related disorders, data linkage

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Elsevier at https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30060-X . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 366 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups