Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of question format on resistance to misleading postevent information and self-reports of events occurring during hypnosis

  • Mitchell L. Eisen*
  • , Maka Oustinovskaya
  • , Rose Kistorian
  • , Danielle Y. Morgan
  • , Laura Mickes
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Participants were administered a standard tape-recorded version of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A (HGSHS:A) and then a modified version of the HGSHS:A response booklet that asked each participant to report which suggested behaviors they performed during the procedures. These response booklets were altered to include 3 additional suggestions not offered during the hypnotic procedures. Half the participants were administered the questions in the response booklet in the standard format ("I performed the suggested behavior" versus "I did not perform the suggested behavior"). The remaining participants were offered a third alternative to each question ("I do not remember this occurring"). As predicted, participants offered the 3rd alternative were significantly less likely to report performing actions that were never suggested during the procedures. Further, these participants reported performing fewer suggested behaviors (i.e., reported passing fewer of the true Harvard items) than participants in the standard 2-alternative condition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-213
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of question format on resistance to misleading postevent information and self-reports of events occurring during hypnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this