The Empathetic Refutational Interview to tackle vaccine misconceptions: Four randomized experiments

Dawn Holford*, Philipp Schmid, Angelo Fasce, Stephan Lewandowsky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Objective:
We introduce and report early-stage testing of a novel, multi-component intervention that can be used by health care professionals (HCPs) to address false or misleading anti-vaccination arguments while maintaining empathy for and understanding of people’s motivations to believe misinformation: the “Empathetic Refutational Interview” (ERI).

Methods:
We conducted four experiments in 2022 with participants who were predominantly negative or on the fence about vaccination (total n = 2,545) to test four steps for tailoring an HCP’s response to a vaccine-hesitant individual: (1) elicit their concerns, (2) affirm their values and beliefs to the extent possible, (3) refute the misinformed beliefs in their reasoning in a way that is tailored to their psychological motivations, and (4) provide factual information about vaccines. Each of the steps was tested against active control conditions, with participants randomised to conditions.

Results:
Overall, compared to controls, we found that observing steps of the ERI produced small effects on increasing vaccine acceptance and lowering support for anti-vaccination arguments. Critically, a HCP who affirmed participants’ concerns generated significantly more support for their refutations and subsequent information, with large effects compared to controls. In addition, participants found tailored refutations (compared to control responses) more compelling, and displayed more trust and openness towards the HCP giving them.

Conclusions:
The ERI can potentially be leveraged and tested further as a tailored communication tool for HCPs to refute anti-vaccination misconceptions while maintaining trust and rapport with patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)426-437
Number of pages12
JournalHealth Psychology
Volume43
Issue number6
Early online date4 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).

Structured keywords

  • Cognitive Science
  • TeDCog

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Empathetic Refutational Interview to tackle vaccine misconceptions: Four randomized experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this