The ethical disruptions of social media data: Tales from the field

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

161 Downloads (Pure)


This chapter explores the perfect storm brewing at the interface of an increasingly organised ethics review process, grounded in principles of anonymity and informed consent, and the formation of a new digital data landscape in which vast quantities of unregulated and often personal information are readily available as research data. This new form of data offers huge potential for insight into everyday activities, values and networks but it also poses some profound challenges, not least as it disrupts the established principles and structures of the ethics review process. The chapter outlines four key disruptions posed by social media data and considers the value of situational ethics as a response. Drawing on the experiences and contributions of PhD students in interdisciplinary Web Science, the chapter concludes that there is a need for more sharing of the ethical challenges faced in the field by those at the 'cutting edge' of social media research and the development of shared resources. This might inform and speed-up the adaptation of ethics review processes to the challenges posed by new forms of digital data, to ensure that academic research with these data can keep pace with the methods and analyses being developed elsewhere, especially in commercial and journalistic contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEthics of Internet-mediated Research and Using Social Media for Social Research
EditorsKandy Woodfield
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic) 978-1-78714-485-9
ISBN (Print)978-1-78714-486-6
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2017

Publication series

NameAdvances in Research Ethics and Integrity
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing
ISSN (Print)2398-6018

Structured keywords

  • Digital Societies


Dive into the research topics of 'The ethical disruptions of social media data: Tales from the field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this