Abstract
Five years ago we surveyed the early years of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment1. At that time there was already a good deal of information available regarding the modus operandi of the Committee which was established but comparatively little regarding the manner in which the Committee was translating its mandate2 into practice. Today the picture has changed considerably. The manner in which the Committee conducts its work is essentially unchanged but from the large corpus of published reports it is possible now to map out the principal standards promulgated by the Committee and through which it seeks to fulfil its functions3. The purpose of this article is to highlight these developments.
| Translated title of the contribution | The European convention for the prevention of torture: 1992-1997 |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 663-675 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | International and Comparative Law Quarterly |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 1997 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The European convention for the prevention of torture: 1992-1997'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver