Abstract
The diversity in hydrologic models has historically led to great controversy on the “correct” approach to process-based hydrologic modeling, with debates centered on the adequacy of process parameterizations, data limitations and uncertainty, and computational constraints on model analysis. In this paper we revisit key modeling challenges, outlined by Freeze and Harlan nearly 50 years ago, on requirements to (1) define suitable model equations, (2) define adequate model parameters, and (3) cope with limitations in computing power. We outline the historical modeling challenges, summarize modeling advances that address these challenges, and define outstanding research needs. We illustrate how modeling advances have been made by groups using models of different type and complexity, and we argue for the need to more effectively use our diversity of modeling approaches in order to advance our collective quest for physically realistic hydrologic models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3427-3440 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 11 Jul 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2017 |
Research Groups and Themes
- Water and Environmental Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver