Skip to content

The evolutionary relationship among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and feeding ecology in modern birds*

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

The evolutionary relationship among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and feeding ecology in modern birds*. / Navalón, Guillermo; Bright, Jen A.; Marugán-Lobón, Jesús; Rayfield, Emily J.

In: Evolution, Vol. 73, No. 3, 15.03.2019, p. 422-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Navalón, Guillermo ; Bright, Jen A. ; Marugán-Lobón, Jesús ; Rayfield, Emily J. / The evolutionary relationship among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and feeding ecology in modern birds*. In: Evolution. 2019 ; Vol. 73, No. 3. pp. 422-435.

Bibtex

@article{a7f17f5519a24c8b8e5c4602dd964684,
title = "The evolutionary relationship among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and feeding ecology in modern birds*",
abstract = "Extensive research on avian adaptive radiations has led to a presumption that beak morphology predicts feeding ecology in birds. However, this ecomorphological relationship has only been quantified in a handful of avian lineages, where associations are of variable strength, and never at a broad macroevolutionary scale. Here, we used shape analysis and phylogenetic comparative methods to quantify the relationships among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and two measures of feeding ecology (feeding behavior and semiquantitative dietary preferences) in a broad sample of modern birds, comprising most living orders. We found a complex relationship, with most variables showing a significant relationship with feeding ecology but little explanatory power. For example, diet accounts for less than 12{\%} of beak shape variation. Similar beak shapes are associated with disparate dietary regimes, even when accounting for diet-feeding behavior relationships and phylogeny. Very few lineages optimize for stronger bite forces, with most birds exhibiting relatively fast, weak bites, even in large predatory taxa. The extreme morphological and behavioral flexibility of the beak in birds suggests that, far from being an exemplary feeding adaptation, avian beak diversification may have been largely contingent on trade-offs and constraints.",
keywords = "Adaptation, beak shape, birds, diet, feeding ecology, mechanical advantage",
author = "Guillermo Naval{\'o}n and Bright, {Jen A.} and Jes{\'u}s Marug{\'a}n-Lob{\'o}n and Rayfield, {Emily J.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2018 The Author(s). Evolution {\circledC} 2018 The Society for the Study of Evolution.",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1111/evo.13655",
language = "English",
volume = "73",
pages = "422--435",
journal = "Evolution",
issn = "1558-5646",
publisher = "Society for the Study of Evolution",
number = "3",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evolutionary relationship among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and feeding ecology in modern birds*

AU - Navalón, Guillermo

AU - Bright, Jen A.

AU - Marugán-Lobón, Jesús

AU - Rayfield, Emily J.

N1 - © 2018 The Author(s). Evolution © 2018 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - Extensive research on avian adaptive radiations has led to a presumption that beak morphology predicts feeding ecology in birds. However, this ecomorphological relationship has only been quantified in a handful of avian lineages, where associations are of variable strength, and never at a broad macroevolutionary scale. Here, we used shape analysis and phylogenetic comparative methods to quantify the relationships among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and two measures of feeding ecology (feeding behavior and semiquantitative dietary preferences) in a broad sample of modern birds, comprising most living orders. We found a complex relationship, with most variables showing a significant relationship with feeding ecology but little explanatory power. For example, diet accounts for less than 12% of beak shape variation. Similar beak shapes are associated with disparate dietary regimes, even when accounting for diet-feeding behavior relationships and phylogeny. Very few lineages optimize for stronger bite forces, with most birds exhibiting relatively fast, weak bites, even in large predatory taxa. The extreme morphological and behavioral flexibility of the beak in birds suggests that, far from being an exemplary feeding adaptation, avian beak diversification may have been largely contingent on trade-offs and constraints.

AB - Extensive research on avian adaptive radiations has led to a presumption that beak morphology predicts feeding ecology in birds. However, this ecomorphological relationship has only been quantified in a handful of avian lineages, where associations are of variable strength, and never at a broad macroevolutionary scale. Here, we used shape analysis and phylogenetic comparative methods to quantify the relationships among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and two measures of feeding ecology (feeding behavior and semiquantitative dietary preferences) in a broad sample of modern birds, comprising most living orders. We found a complex relationship, with most variables showing a significant relationship with feeding ecology but little explanatory power. For example, diet accounts for less than 12% of beak shape variation. Similar beak shapes are associated with disparate dietary regimes, even when accounting for diet-feeding behavior relationships and phylogeny. Very few lineages optimize for stronger bite forces, with most birds exhibiting relatively fast, weak bites, even in large predatory taxa. The extreme morphological and behavioral flexibility of the beak in birds suggests that, far from being an exemplary feeding adaptation, avian beak diversification may have been largely contingent on trade-offs and constraints.

KW - Adaptation

KW - beak shape

KW - birds

KW - diet

KW - feeding ecology

KW - mechanical advantage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058976524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/evo.13655

DO - 10.1111/evo.13655

M3 - Article

C2 - 30537045

AN - SCOPUS:85058976524

VL - 73

SP - 422

EP - 435

JO - Evolution

JF - Evolution

SN - 1558-5646

IS - 3

ER -