Abstract
This study explores implications of the failure to accommodate formal land restitution in the Zimbabwean Fast-Track Land Reform Programme (FTLRP), resulting in neglect of local communities’ autochthonous connections to land especially where their interests clash with those of political elites. It makes the point that this opened land reform to abuse by political elites and marginalized competing local community interests in prime land and valuable agricultural properties. In the absence of a formal policy for restitution, elites mobilized political and state power to enforce their commercial interests over those of neighbouring communities. Drawing from international experiences, the study argues that a formal policy of land restitution would enable local communities, including ethnic minorities, to legally reclaim lost ancestral land and limit elite capture of valuable agricultural properties
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 217-232 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Africa Review |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Nov 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
Research Groups and Themes
- SPS Centre for the Study of Poverty and Social Justice
- SPS Inequalities and Social Welfare Research Centre
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The fast-track land reform programme in Zimbabwe: implications for land restitution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver