Abstract
Barelli [P. Barelli, On the genericity of full surplus extraction in mechanism design, J. Econ. Theory 144 (2009) 1320-1332] defines beliefs-determine-preferences (BDP) models and argues that BDP models are nongeneric in a topological sense. In this note, we point out some difficulties in Barelli's approach. Furthermore, we follow the idea of Heifetz and Neeman [A. Heifetz, Z. Neeman, On the generic (im)possibility of full surplus extraction, Econometrica 74 (2006) 213-233] to propose a more relevant notion of BDP* model. We prove that BDP* models are generic, which is opposite to Barelli's conclusion. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 751-761 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Economic Theory |
| Volume | 146 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2011 |
Keywords
- Mechanism design
- Full surplus extraction
- Beliefs-determine-preferences priors
- Common priors
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The genericity of beliefs-determine-preferences models revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver