The Gradability of ‘Conscious’

Andrew Y. Lee*, Poppy Mankowitz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Are some creatures “more conscious” than others? A number of consciousness researchers have aimed to answer this question. Yet some have claimed that this question does not even make sense. They claim that “conscious” (in the phenomenal sense) never occurs as a gradable adjective, meaning an adjective that permits degree expressions (“more f than,” “slightly f,” etc.) and that is associated with a degreed property. Both sides face an explanatory burden: they must explain why some competent speakers seem confused about the meaning of “conscious.” We argue that the question does make sense: “conscious” sometimes functions as a minimal-standard gradable adjective. But we will also explain why some theorists have been skeptical about gradable uses of “conscious.” Along the way, we address the objection that many gradable constructions involving “what it's like” expressions are infelicitous, distinguish two interpretations of “phenomenal consciousness,” and discuss how our semantic arguments bear on the metaphysical question of whether consciousness comes in degrees.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages14
JournalPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
Early online date14 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 14 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Gradability of ‘Conscious’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this