Skip to content

The implications of Labour's plan to scrap Key Stage 2 tests for Progress 8 and secondary school accountability in England

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages41
JournalarXiv
DateUnpublished - 15 Nov 2019

Abstract

In England, Progress 8 is the Conservative government's headline secondary school performance and accountability measure. Progress 8 attempts to measure the average academic progress pupils make in each school between their KS2 tests and their GCSE Attainment 8 examinations. The Labour opposition recently announced they would scrap the KS2 tests were they to be elected. Such a move, however, would preclude the publication of Progress 8 and would leave schools to be compared in terms of their average Attainment 8 scores or, at best, their Attainment 8 scores only adjusted for school differences in pupil demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. In this paper, we argue and illustrate empirically that this best-case scenario of an 'Adjusted Attainment 8' measure would prove less fair and meaningful than Progress 8 and therefore a backwards step, especially when Progress 8 itself has been criticised as biased against schools teaching educationally disadvantaged intakes.

    Research areas

  • school accountability, school performance measures, school league tables, value-added, Attainment 8, Progress 8, National Pupil Database, Conservative party, Labour party, educational policy

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (submitted manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the submitted manuscript (SM). Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the author.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.44 MB, PDF document

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups