The Importance of Being Wrong: Interpreting the Roots of Change in Rural Thailand

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter reflects on more than three decades of ‘being wrong’. In so doing, it partly highlights the point that we should expect to be wrong when it comes to research in the social sciences and humanities, and possibly be wrong more than ‘right’. Being wrong is nothing to hide: our ideas need to be exposed to being proved, in time, wrong. Evidently, this is the way in which we get things right. The chapter dwells on four aspects of error, focusing in turn on the methods we use, the theoretical or conceptual framings we employ, our interpretations of the ‘data’ we generate, and the histories we recount. To make the case, the chapter will draw and reflect on field research in rural Thailand.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication Fieldwork and the Self
Subtitle of host publicationChanging Research Styles in Southeast Asia
EditorsJeremy Jammes, Victor T. King
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Pages55-73
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic) 978-981-16-2438-4
ISBN (Print) 978-981-16-2437-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2021

Publication series

NameAsia in Transition
Volume12
ISSN (Print)2364-8252
ISSN (Electronic)2364-8260

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Keywords

  • Error
  • Fieldwork
  • Methods
  • Research
  • Rural
  • Thailand

Cite this