Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impossibility of separating age, period and cohort effects

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

143 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This commentary discusses the age-period-cohort identification problem. It shows that, despite a plethora of proposed solutions in the literature, no model is able to solve the identification problem because the identification problem is inherent to the real-world processes being modelled. As such, we cast doubt on the conclusions of a number of papers, including one presented here (Page, Milner, Morrell, & Taylor, 2013). We conclude with some recommendations for those wanting to model age, period and cohort in a compelling way.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-5
Number of pages3
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume93
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Employment
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Suicide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impossibility of separating age, period and cohort effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Lemma 3

    Rintoul, D. A. (Principal Investigator)

    1/10/11 → 30/09/14

    Project: Research

Cite this