TY - JOUR
T1 - The Infant KIdney Dialysis and Utrafiltration (I-KID) Study
T2 - A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Study in Infants, Comparing Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration, and Newcastle Infant Dialysis Ultrafiltration System, a Novel Infant Hemodialysis Device
AU - Lambert, Heather
AU - Hiu, Shaun
AU - Coulthard, Malcolm G.
AU - Matthews, John N.S.
AU - Holstein, Eva Maria
AU - Crosier, Jean
AU - Agbeko, Rachel
AU - Brick, Thomas
AU - Duncan, Heather
AU - Grant, David
AU - Mok, Quen
AU - Nyman, Andrew Gustaf
AU - Pappachan, John
AU - Boucher, Chris
AU - Bulmer, Joe
AU - Chisholm, Denise
AU - Cromie, Kirsten
AU - Emmet, Victoria
AU - Feltbower, Richard G.
AU - Ghose, Arunoday
AU - Grayling, Michael
AU - Harrison, Rebecca
AU - Kennedy, Ciara A.
AU - Mccoll, Elaine
AU - Morris, Kevin
AU - Norman, Lee
AU - Office, Julie
AU - Parslow, Roger
AU - Pattinson, Christine
AU - Sharma, Shriya
AU - Smith, Jonathan
AU - Steel, Alison
AU - Steel, Rachel
AU - Straker, Jayne
AU - Vrana, Lamprini
AU - Walker, Jenn
AU - Wellman, Paul
AU - Whitaker, Mike
AU - Wightman, Jim
AU - Wilson, Nina
AU - Wirz, Lucy
AU - Wood, Ruth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - Objectives: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) options are limited for small babies because of lack of available technology. We investigated the precision of ultrafiltration, biochemical clearances, clinical efficacy, outcomes, and safety profile for a novel non-Conformité Européenne-marked hemodialysis device for babies under 8 kg, the Newcastle Infant Dialysis Ultrafiltration System (NIDUS), compared with the current options of peritoneal dialysis (PD) or continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Design: Nonblinded cluster-randomized cross-sectional stepped-wedge design with four periods, three sequences, and two clusters per sequence. Setting: Clusters were six U.K. PICUs. Patients: Babies less than 8 kg requiring RRT for fluid overload or biochemical disturbance. Interventions: In controls, RRT was delivered by PD or CVVH, and in interventions, NIDUS was used. The primary outcome was precision of ultrafiltration compared with prescription; secondary outcomes included biochemical clearances. Measurements and Main Results: At closure, 97 participants were recruited from the six PICUs (62 control and 35 intervention). The primary outcome, obtained from 62 control and 21 intervention patients, showed that ultrafiltration with NIDUS was closer to that prescribed than with control: sd controls, 18.75, intervention, 2.95 (mL/hr); adjusted ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.71; p = 0.018. Creatinine clearance was smallest and least variable for PD (mean, sd) = (0.08, 0.03) mL/min/kg, larger for NIDUS (0.46, 0.30), and largest for CVVH (1.20, 0.72). Adverse events were reported in all groups. In this critically ill population with multiple organ failure, mortality was lowest for PD and highest for CVVH, with NIDUS in between. Conclusions: NIDUS delivers accurate, controllable fluid removal and adequate clearances, indicating that it has important potential alongside other modalities for infant RRT.
AB - Objectives: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) options are limited for small babies because of lack of available technology. We investigated the precision of ultrafiltration, biochemical clearances, clinical efficacy, outcomes, and safety profile for a novel non-Conformité Européenne-marked hemodialysis device for babies under 8 kg, the Newcastle Infant Dialysis Ultrafiltration System (NIDUS), compared with the current options of peritoneal dialysis (PD) or continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). Design: Nonblinded cluster-randomized cross-sectional stepped-wedge design with four periods, three sequences, and two clusters per sequence. Setting: Clusters were six U.K. PICUs. Patients: Babies less than 8 kg requiring RRT for fluid overload or biochemical disturbance. Interventions: In controls, RRT was delivered by PD or CVVH, and in interventions, NIDUS was used. The primary outcome was precision of ultrafiltration compared with prescription; secondary outcomes included biochemical clearances. Measurements and Main Results: At closure, 97 participants were recruited from the six PICUs (62 control and 35 intervention). The primary outcome, obtained from 62 control and 21 intervention patients, showed that ultrafiltration with NIDUS was closer to that prescribed than with control: sd controls, 18.75, intervention, 2.95 (mL/hr); adjusted ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.71; p = 0.018. Creatinine clearance was smallest and least variable for PD (mean, sd) = (0.08, 0.03) mL/min/kg, larger for NIDUS (0.46, 0.30), and largest for CVVH (1.20, 0.72). Adverse events were reported in all groups. In this critically ill population with multiple organ failure, mortality was lowest for PD and highest for CVVH, with NIDUS in between. Conclusions: NIDUS delivers accurate, controllable fluid removal and adequate clearances, indicating that it has important potential alongside other modalities for infant RRT.
KW - acute kidney injury
KW - dialysis
KW - infant
KW - renal failure
KW - renal replacement therapy
KW - ultrafiltration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164271534&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003220
DO - 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003220
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 36892305
SN - 1529-7535
VL - 24
SP - 604
EP - 613
JO - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
JF - Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
IS - 7
ER -