Skip to content

The IPBES conceptual framework: An unhelpful start

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-347
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
Volume29
Issue number2
Early online date26 Nov 2015
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 11 Nov 2015
DateE-pub ahead of print - 26 Nov 2015
DatePublished (current) - Apr 2016

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) have recently launched themselves as the UN-sanctioned instrument for conserving nature. They seek to establish themselves as the authority in this field alongside the well-known Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in climate science. Quickly following or even before recent publication of their conceptual framework in two biology journals, they were already underway building upon it. This headlong push, we believe, is ill advised. We show how the framework is unsound as a foundation for further work—in a number of ways and perhaps even by its authors’ own lights. It is therefore urgent that the IPBES thoroughly and thoughtfully reconsider their framework before too much effort is wasted.

    Research areas

  • Biodiversity, Conservation, Economic valuation, Ecosystem services, Stakeholders, Sustainable development, Value

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Springer at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9584-5. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 216 KB, PDF document

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups