The Muhammad Cartoons and Multicultural Democracies

G. Levey, T Modood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


The Danish cartoon affair presents a vehicle for rethinking some of our longstanding assumptions about liberal democracy and its capacity to accommodate cultural difference. The public and academic debates have tended to frame the affair as either a clash between liberal-democratic and illiberal religious values or as a question of whose position is most consistent with liberal-democratic values. We begin, instead, from the assumption that liberal-democratic values conflict, not only between liberalism and democracy, but also within liberalism and democracy. We argue that cases such as the Muhammad cartoons controversy present liberal democracies with choices about which liberal-democratic principles and conceptions of these principles they emphasize and when. Guiding these choices should also be the pragmatic question of how best to make multicultural democracies work. We suggest that the Muhammad cartoons encompass not one, but three distinct problem areas: the violation of a religious norm in the representation of Muhammad, attacks on Islam as a religion, and attacks on Muslims as a group. We examine how liberal democratic values and multicultural citizenship relate to each of these cases, and argue that attacks on Muslims as a group are a form of racism.
Translated title of the contributionThe Muhammad Cartoons and Multicultural Democracies
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427 - 447
Number of pages21
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Bibliographical note

Publisher: Sage

Structured keywords

  • SPAIS Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship


Dive into the research topics of 'The Muhammad Cartoons and Multicultural Democracies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this