The Nearest Relative in the Mental Health Act 2007: Still an illusionary and inconsistent safeguard?

Judith M, Jeremy Dixon, Kevin Stone, Megan Wilkinson-Tough

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
420 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The role of Nearest Relative is intended as a safeguard in the Mental Health Act 1983 (as amended in 2007) to curb the excesses of professional discretion and protect patients from unwarranted compulsory hospitalisation. It is unique to the mental health compulsory detention process in England and Wales. There are, however, evident tensions in the role and a lack of clarity surrounding the precise functions of the nearest relative. There is also some uncertainty and confusion among practitioners about the scope of the nearest relative involvement. Despite longstanding concerns about the role, there is remarkably little published research available to date on its use and effectiveness, in so far as evaluating the extent to which it provides an adequate safeguard for patients, as intended by the legislation. This article will briefly explore the background to the role, highlight some of the difficulties and tensions within it and conclude with some observations about where further research and reform may be needed to provide greater protection and clarity for patients, relatives and health and social care practitioners.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-56
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date6 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Mar 2018

Bibliographical note

Special Issue to mark 40th anniversary

Structured keywords

  • LAW Centre for Health Law and Society

Keywords

  • Mental Health Act
  • nearest relative
  • patient rights
  • safeguard
  • Approved Mental Health Professional
  • families and carers

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Nearest Relative in the Mental Health Act 2007: Still an illusionary and inconsistent safeguard?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this