The optimal stomatal response to atmospheric CO2 concentration: Alternative solutions, alternative interpretations

Belinda E. Medlyn*, Remko A. Duursma, Martin G. De Kauwe, I. Colin Prentice

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Modelling of stomatal conductance was a key discussion topic at the workshop held in honour of Ray Leuning's retirement. In this note, we compare two recently published alternative models derived from optimal stomatal theory (Katul et al., 2010; Medlyn et al., 2011). We show that stomatal behaviour clearly departs from that predicted by optimal stomatal theory when Rubisco activity is limiting to photosynthesis. There are two possible alternative interpretations of this observation: either the stomatal behaviour is not optimal, or else the optimisation problem is incorrectly specified. We show that the alternative models effectively follow these alternative interpretations, and consider the implications for our understanding of stomatal behaviour.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-203
Number of pages4
JournalAgricultural and Forest Meteorology
Volume182-183
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2013

Keywords

  • Optimisation
  • Stomatal conductance model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The optimal stomatal response to atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentration: Alternative solutions, alternative interpretations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this