Skip to content

The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative : Incentivizing open research practices through peer review. / Morey, Richard D.; Chambers, Christopher D.; Etchells, Peter J.; Harris, Christine R.; Hoekstra, Rink; Lakens, Daniël; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Morey, Candice Coker; Newman, Daniel P.; Schönbrodt, Felix D.; Vanpaemel, Wolf; Wagenmakers, Eric Jan; Zwaan, Rolf A.

In: Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 3, No. 1, 150547, 13.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Morey, RD, Chambers, CD, Etchells, PJ, Harris, CR, Hoekstra, R, Lakens, D, Lewandowsky, S, Morey, CC, Newman, DP, Schönbrodt, FD, Vanpaemel, W, Wagenmakers, EJ & Zwaan, RA 2016, 'The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review', Royal Society Open Science, vol. 3, no. 1, 150547. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547

APA

Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., ... Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), [150547]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547

Vancouver

Morey RD, Chambers CD, Etchells PJ, Harris CR, Hoekstra R, Lakens D et al. The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science. 2016 Jan 13;3(1). 150547. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547

Author

Morey, Richard D. ; Chambers, Christopher D. ; Etchells, Peter J. ; Harris, Christine R. ; Hoekstra, Rink ; Lakens, Daniël ; Lewandowsky, Stephan ; Morey, Candice Coker ; Newman, Daniel P. ; Schönbrodt, Felix D. ; Vanpaemel, Wolf ; Wagenmakers, Eric Jan ; Zwaan, Rolf A. / The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative : Incentivizing open research practices through peer review. In: Royal Society Open Science. 2016 ; Vol. 3, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{396ae28d8a2748248afb5d500c97f51b,
title = "The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review",
abstract = "Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration even after a paper has been published. Although modern information technology makes sharing easier than ever before, uptake of open practices had been slow. We suggest this might be in part due to a social dilemma arising from misaligned incentives and propose a specific, concrete mechanism—reviewers withholding comprehensive review—to achieve the goal of creating the expectation of open practices as a matter of scientific principle.",
keywords = "Open research, Peer review, Science, Transparency",
author = "Morey, {Richard D.} and Chambers, {Christopher D.} and Etchells, {Peter J.} and Harris, {Christine R.} and Rink Hoekstra and Dani{\"e}l Lakens and Stephan Lewandowsky and Morey, {Candice Coker} and Newman, {Daniel P.} and Sch{\"o}nbrodt, {Felix D.} and Wolf Vanpaemel and Wagenmakers, {Eric Jan} and Zwaan, {Rolf A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1098/rsos.150547",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
journal = "Royal Society Open Science",
issn = "2054-5703",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "1",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative

T2 - Incentivizing open research practices through peer review

AU - Morey, Richard D.

AU - Chambers, Christopher D.

AU - Etchells, Peter J.

AU - Harris, Christine R.

AU - Hoekstra, Rink

AU - Lakens, Daniël

AU - Lewandowsky, Stephan

AU - Morey, Candice Coker

AU - Newman, Daniel P.

AU - Schönbrodt, Felix D.

AU - Vanpaemel, Wolf

AU - Wagenmakers, Eric Jan

AU - Zwaan, Rolf A.

PY - 2016/1/13

Y1 - 2016/1/13

N2 - Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration even after a paper has been published. Although modern information technology makes sharing easier than ever before, uptake of open practices had been slow. We suggest this might be in part due to a social dilemma arising from misaligned incentives and propose a specific, concrete mechanism—reviewers withholding comprehensive review—to achieve the goal of creating the expectation of open practices as a matter of scientific principle.

AB - Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration even after a paper has been published. Although modern information technology makes sharing easier than ever before, uptake of open practices had been slow. We suggest this might be in part due to a social dilemma arising from misaligned incentives and propose a specific, concrete mechanism—reviewers withholding comprehensive review—to achieve the goal of creating the expectation of open practices as a matter of scientific principle.

KW - Open research

KW - Peer review

KW - Science

KW - Transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958078167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rsos.150547

DO - 10.1098/rsos.150547

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Royal Society Open Science

JF - Royal Society Open Science

SN - 2054-5703

IS - 1

M1 - 150547

ER -