The perception and acceptability of pre-slaughter and post-slaughter stunning for Halal production: The views of UK Islamic scholars and Halal consumers

Awal Fuseini, Stephen Wotton, Phil J. Hadley, Toby G Knowles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)
452 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The importance of religious slaughter from economic, emotive and ethical viewpoints is significant. There are apparent economic benefits associated with trading in meats slaughtered according to religious traditions. Some religious authorities insist on the slaughter of animals without stunning, but this, according to many researchers, compromises animal welfare. We conducted a survey of Islamic scholars and Halal consumers, 66 scholars from 55 organisations and 314 consumers from 54 UK cities/towns were surveyed. Forty-nine scholars were interviewed through pre-arranged meetings, 17 surveyed online whilst all 314 consumers were either surveyed online or through the remote completion of copies of the questionnaire. Most of the scholars (>95%) (CI 86.9 to 98.4%) agreed that if an animal is stunned and then slaughtered by a Muslim and the method of stunning does not result in death, cause physical injury or obstruct bleed-out, the meat would be Halal and 53% (CI 47 to 58%) consumers also thought such meat would be Halal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143–150
Number of pages8
JournalMeat Science
Volume123
Early online date29 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Halal consumer
  • Halal slaughter
  • Islamic scholar
  • Stunning
  • Animal welfare
  • Halal meat

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The perception and acceptability of pre-slaughter and post-slaughter stunning for Halal production: The views of UK Islamic scholars and Halal consumers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this