The phylogenetic position of ctenophores and the origin(s) of nervous systems

Gáspár Jékely*, Jordi Paps, Claus Nielsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article (Academic Journal)peer-review

101 Citations (Scopus)


Ctenophores have traditionally been treated as eumetazoans, but some recent whole genome studies have revived the idea that they are, rather, the sister group to all other metazoans. This deep branching position implies either that nervous systems have evolved twice, in Ctenophora and in Eumetazoa, or that an ancestral metazoan nervous system has been lost in sponges and placozoans. We caution, however, that phylogenetic-tree construction artifacts may have placed ctenophores too deep in the metazoan tree. We discuss nervous system origins under these alternative phylogenies and in light of comparative data of ctenophore and eumetazoan nervous systems. We argue that characters like neuropeptide signaling, ciliary photoreceptors, gap junctions and presynaptic molecules are consistent with a shared ancestry of nervous systems. However, if ctenophores are the sister group to all other metazoans, this ancestral nervous system was likely very simple. Further studies are needed to resolve the deep phylogeny of metazoans and to have a better understanding of the early steps of nervous system evolution.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jan 2015


  • Ciliary photoreceptor
  • Cnidarian
  • Ctenophore
  • DEG/ENaC channels
  • Metazoan phylogeny
  • MicroRNA
  • Nervous system evolution
  • Neuropeptide
  • Sponge
  • Trichoplax


Dive into the research topics of 'The phylogenetic position of ctenophores and the origin(s) of nervous systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this