The rationale of rationalization

Walter Veit; Joe Dewhurst; Krzysztof Dołęga; Max D L Jones; Shaun T Stanley; Keith Frankish; Daniel Dennett

doi:10.1017/S0140525X19002164

The rationale of rationalization

Walter Veit, Joe Dewhurst, Krzysztof Dołęga, Max D L Jones, Shaun T Stanley, Keith Frankish, Daniel Dennett

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate (Academic Journal) › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While we agree in broad strokes with the characterisation of rationalization as a “useful fiction,” we think that Fiery Cushman's claim remains ambiguous in two crucial respects: (1) the reality of beliefs and desires, that is, the fictional status of folk-psychological entities and (2) the degree to which they should be understood as useful. Our aim is to clarify both points and explicate the rationale of rationalization.

Original language	English
Article number	e53
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	43
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19002164
Publication status	Published - 15 Apr 2020

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X19002164

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{1242004d1099482d866bf76a2c15e2a2,

title = "The rationale of rationalization",

abstract = "While we agree in broad strokes with the characterisation of rationalization as a “useful fiction,” we think that Fiery Cushman's claim remains ambiguous in two crucial respects: (1) the reality of beliefs and desires, that is, the fictional status of folk-psychological entities and (2) the degree to which they should be understood as useful. Our aim is to clarify both points and explicate the rationale of rationalization.",

author = "Walter Veit and Joe Dewhurst and Krzysztof Do{\l}{\c e}ga and Jones, {Max D L} and Stanley, {Shaun T} and Keith Frankish and Daniel Dennett",

year = "2020",

month = apr,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X19002164",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rationale of rationalization

AU - Veit, Walter

AU - Dewhurst, Joe

AU - Dołęga, Krzysztof

AU - Jones, Max D L

AU - Stanley, Shaun T

AU - Frankish, Keith

AU - Dennett, Daniel

PY - 2020/4/15

Y1 - 2020/4/15

N2 - While we agree in broad strokes with the characterisation of rationalization as a “useful fiction,” we think that Fiery Cushman's claim remains ambiguous in two crucial respects: (1) the reality of beliefs and desires, that is, the fictional status of folk-psychological entities and (2) the degree to which they should be understood as useful. Our aim is to clarify both points and explicate the rationale of rationalization.

AB - While we agree in broad strokes with the characterisation of rationalization as a “useful fiction,” we think that Fiery Cushman's claim remains ambiguous in two crucial respects: (1) the reality of beliefs and desires, that is, the fictional status of folk-psychological entities and (2) the degree to which they should be understood as useful. Our aim is to clarify both points and explicate the rationale of rationalization.

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X19002164

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X19002164

M3 - Comment/debate (Academic Journal)

C2 - 32292161

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 43

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

M1 - e53

ER -