Abstract
Article 6 Treaty on European Union sets out two sources of fundamental rights in the EU—the Charter and the general principles of EU law—without specifying a hierarchy between them. Even though the Charter became binding over a decade ago, the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) is yet to clarify unequivocally how these two sources interact. In this article I argue based upon the relevant legal framework that the Charter ought to replace the general principles it enshrines. This leaves a role for general principles in the incorporation of new and additional rights into the EU legal framework. Such an approach is necessary to ensure that the Charter achieves its aims in enhancing the visibility of the rights protected by EU law, while also providing the impetus for more coherent rights protection within the EU. What an extensive survey of CJEU case law in the field of non-discrimination shows, however, is that the CJEU has struggled to let its general principles case law go, potentially hampering the transformative potential of the Charter.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 233-257 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies |
Volume | 22 |
Early online date | 11 Nov 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- Charter
- fundamental rights
- general principles
- discrimination
- equal treatment
- Article 6 TEU