TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of perspective taking on attention
T2 - A review of the special issue on the reflexive attentional shift phenomenon
AU - Pesimena, Gabriele
AU - Wilson, Christopher J.
AU - Bertamini, Marco
AU - Soranzo, Alessandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© MDPI AG. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10/9
Y1 - 2019/10/9
N2 - Attention is a process that alters how cognitive resources are allocated, and it allows individuals to efficiently process information at the attended location. The presence of visual or auditory cues in the environment can direct the focus of attention toward certain stimuli even if the cued stimuli are not the individual’s primary target. Samson et al. demonstrated that seeing another person in the scene (i.e., a person-like cue) caused a delay in responding to target stimuli not visible to that person: “alter-centric intrusion.” This phenomenon, they argue, is dependent upon the fact that the cue used resembled a person as opposed to a more generic directional indicator. The characteristics of the cue are the core of the debate of this special issue. Some maintain that the perceptual-directional characteristics of the cue are sufficient to generate the bias while others argue that the cuing is stronger when the cue has social characteristics (relates to what another individual can perceive). The research contained in this issue confirms that human attention is biased by the presence of a directional cue. We discuss and compare the different studies. The pattern that emerges seems to suggest that the social relevance of the cue is necessary in some contexts but not in others, depending on the cognitive demand of the experimental task. One possibility is that the social mechanisms are involved in perspective taking when the task is cognitively demanding, while they may not play a role in automatic attention allocation.
AB - Attention is a process that alters how cognitive resources are allocated, and it allows individuals to efficiently process information at the attended location. The presence of visual or auditory cues in the environment can direct the focus of attention toward certain stimuli even if the cued stimuli are not the individual’s primary target. Samson et al. demonstrated that seeing another person in the scene (i.e., a person-like cue) caused a delay in responding to target stimuli not visible to that person: “alter-centric intrusion.” This phenomenon, they argue, is dependent upon the fact that the cue used resembled a person as opposed to a more generic directional indicator. The characteristics of the cue are the core of the debate of this special issue. Some maintain that the perceptual-directional characteristics of the cue are sufficient to generate the bias while others argue that the cuing is stronger when the cue has social characteristics (relates to what another individual can perceive). The research contained in this issue confirms that human attention is biased by the presence of a directional cue. We discuss and compare the different studies. The pattern that emerges seems to suggest that the social relevance of the cue is necessary in some contexts but not in others, depending on the cognitive demand of the experimental task. One possibility is that the social mechanisms are involved in perspective taking when the task is cognitively demanding, while they may not play a role in automatic attention allocation.
KW - Alter-centric intrusion
KW - Gaze perception
KW - Perspective taking
KW - Reflexive attentional shift
KW - Theory of mind
KW - Viewpoint
KW - Visual attention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079424434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/vision3040052
DO - 10.3390/vision3040052
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 31735853
SN - 2411-5150
VL - 3
JO - Vision
JF - Vision
IS - 4
M1 - 52
ER -