Abstract
The aftermath of the great end-Permian period mass extinction 252 Myr ago shows how life can recover from the loss of >90% species globally. The crisis was triggered by a number of physical environmental shocks (global warming, acid rain, ocean acidification and ocean anoxia), and some of these were repeated over the next 5-6 Myr. Ammonoids and some other groups diversified rapidly, within 1-3 Myr, but extinctions continued through the Early Triassic period. Triassic ecosystems were rebuilt stepwise from low to high trophic levels through the Early to Middle Triassic, and a stable, complex ecosystem did not re-emerge until the beginning of the Middle Triassic, 8-9 Myr after the crisis. A positive aspect of the recovery was the emergence of entirely new groups, such as marine reptiles and decapod crustaceans, as well as new tetrapods on land, including-eventually-dinosaurs. The stepwise recovery of life in the Triassic could have been delayed either by biotic drivers (complex multispecies interactions) or physical perturbations, or a combination of both. This is an example of the wider debate about the relative roles of intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of large-scale evolution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 375-383 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Nature Geoscience |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The timing and pattern of biotic recovery following the end-Permian mass extinction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
THE LATE PERMIAN CRISIS: THE CONTINENTAL RECORD FROM RUSSIA
Benton, M. J. (Principal Investigator)
1/04/06 → 1/01/10
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver