The treatment preferences of adolescents and their parents, what has the smile RCT shown us? SMILE: specialist medical intervention and lightning evaluation: Trials. 2015; 16(Suppl 2): Published online 2015 Nov 16.

Lucy Beasant; Nicola Mills; Esther Crawley

doi:10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P71

The treatment preferences of adolescents and their parents, what has the smile RCT shown us? SMILE: specialist medical intervention and lightning evaluation: Trials. 2015; 16(Suppl 2): Published online 2015 Nov 16.

Lucy Beasant, Nicola Mills, Esther Crawley

Research output: Contribution to conference › Conference Poster › peer-review

Abstract

Recruitment and retention in adult RCTs is affected by patient treatment preference. Identifying preference, providing evidence-based information, and emphasising the equivalence of treatments has facilitated recruitment to adult RCTs. There is no evidence on how to identify preference in paediatric RCTs.

Original language	English
Pages	71
Number of pages	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P71
Publication status	Published - 16 Nov 2015

Access to Document

10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P71

Handle.net

Persistent link

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The treatment preferences of adolescents and their parents, what has the smile RCT shown us? SMILE: specialist medical intervention and lightning evaluation: Trials. 2015; 16(Suppl 2): Published online 2015 Nov 16.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

ConDuCT-II
Blazeby, J. (Principal Investigator)
1/04/14 → 31/03/19
Project: Research

Cite this

@conference{4d24f5bb3a88450597e628cebba1907d,

title = "The treatment preferences of adolescents and their parents, what has the smile RCT shown us? SMILE: specialist medical intervention and lightning evaluation: Trials. 2015; 16(Suppl 2): Published online 2015 Nov 16.",

abstract = "Recruitment and retention in adult RCTs is affected by patient treatment preference. Identifying preference, providing evidence-based information, and emphasising the equivalence of treatments has facilitated recruitment to adult RCTs. There is no evidence on how to identify preference in paediatric RCTs.",

author = "Lucy Beasant and Nicola Mills and Esther Crawley",

year = "2015",

month = nov,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P71",

language = "English",

pages = "71",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - The treatment preferences of adolescents and their parents, what has the smile RCT shown us? SMILE: specialist medical intervention and lightning evaluation

T2 - Trials. 2015; 16(Suppl 2): Published online 2015 Nov 16.

AU - Beasant, Lucy

AU - Mills, Nicola

AU - Crawley, Esther

PY - 2015/11/16

Y1 - 2015/11/16

N2 - Recruitment and retention in adult RCTs is affected by patient treatment preference. Identifying preference, providing evidence-based information, and emphasising the equivalence of treatments has facilitated recruitment to adult RCTs. There is no evidence on how to identify preference in paediatric RCTs.

AB - Recruitment and retention in adult RCTs is affected by patient treatment preference. Identifying preference, providing evidence-based information, and emphasising the equivalence of treatments has facilitated recruitment to adult RCTs. There is no evidence on how to identify preference in paediatric RCTs.

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P71

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P71

M3 - Conference Poster

SP - 71

ER -

The treatment preferences of adolescents and their parents, what has the smile RCT shown us? SMILE: specialist medical intervention and lightning evaluation: Trials. 2015; 16(Suppl 2): Published online 2015 Nov 16.

Abstract

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Projects

ConDuCT-II

Cite this