Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Union’s liability for failure to adjudicate within a reasonable time: EU tort law after Gascogne, Kendrion and ASPLA

Paul Verbruggen, Katarzyna Kryla-Cudna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The non-contractual liability for damages caused by judicial decisions is one of the most disputed domains of tort law.1 EU law has contributed greatly to the development of this specific domain of State liability law at Member State level. The decisions in Francovich, Brasserie du Pêcheur and Köbler set out the general legal framework for damages actions if national courts misapply EU law.2 In the cases of Gascogne, Kendrion and ASPLA the Court of Justice of the EU found itself confronted – for the first time – with a number of separate damages actions for breach of EU law, namely the alleged failure to adjudicate within a reasonable time as required by paragraph 2 of Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Charter). All these damages claims followed on a delayed dismissal of annulment actions by the applicants against a Commission Decision finding a violation of Article 101 TFEU (the cartel prohibition) in the Industrial Bags case.3

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-226
Number of pages36
JournalCommon Market Law Review
Volume57
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Kluwer Law International. Printed in the United Kingdom.

Keywords

  • tort law
  • EU tort law
  • non-pecuniary loss
  • damages

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Union’s liability for failure to adjudicate within a reasonable time: EU tort law after Gascogne, Kendrion and ASPLA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this