Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The use of online consultation tools for common mental health conditions in UK primary care: a qualitative interview study of patient and practitioner perspectives

Charlotte Archer*, David Kessler, Louise Ting, Nicola Wiles, Katrina Turner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background:
UK general practices are now required to make online consultation tools available during practice hours. Evidence shows patients increasingly use them to access mental health support under the ‘digital first’ approach. Whilst they may increase time-efficiency for practices, we do not know whether practitioners and patients view them as a suitable consultation mode to discuss mental health. Our aim was to explore patients’ and practitioners’ views and experiences of using online consultation tools for mental health, to inform their future use.

Method:
In-depth interviews with 20 primary care practitioners and 21 patients. A topic guide was used to ensure consistency across interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically. There was patient and public involvement throughout.

Results:
Patients and practitioners said online consultation tools encouraged reflective thinking about mental health and symptom disclosure. However, patients’ concerns around who might read the output meant they only provided limited information. Patients also reported online tools can be a barrier to accessing care, and those with less mental health literacy may struggle to articulate their concerns. Practitioners noted that continuity of care can be reduced when using online tools, and triage is more challenging if insufficient information is provided to determine if urgent care is needed.

Conclusion:
To ensure that online consultation tools do not increase inequity, they should remain part of a range of options for accessing mental health support in general practice and should not be a mandatory first step to access care. Online consultation tools can provide useful information for practitioners and may be more accessible than a telephone call for patients with anxiety or depression. However, practitioners may struggle to assess patient risk using these tools, which could mean patients do not receive the care they need. Patients might need support when first using online consultation tools and advice on who will access the information provided.
Original languageEnglish
Article number87
Number of pages10
JournalBMC Primary Care
Volume27
Issue number1
Early online date5 Feb 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Mar 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The use of online consultation tools for common mental health conditions in UK primary care: a qualitative interview study of patient and practitioner perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this