The use of summarization tasks: some lexical and conceptual analyses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)


This article reports the lexical diversity of summaries written by experts and test takers in an empirical study and then interrogates the (in)congruity between the conceptualisations of “summary” and “summarize” in the literature of educational research and the operationalization of summarization tasks in three international English language tests in relation to their task directions and assessment criteria. These analyses show that summarization is not a uniform construct; rather, it is multidimensional in terms of its purposes, functions, and practices in real-life contexts, and as a consequence not particularly well operationalized in language tests and so in need of precise definitions for specific assessment contexts. This conclusion has implications for designing summarization tasks and assessing task performance. First, clear and transparent task directions are essential to ensure that test takers and evaluators share a common understanding of a test task; test takers need to be instructed what kind of summary they are expected to produce, particularly what information to include and to exclude. Second, because summarization may well be a unique type of writing process, it is important to employ parameters different from and additional to those for independent composition writing in order to measure the quality of a summary effectively.
Translated title of the contributionThe use of summarization tasks: some theoretical and lexical considerations
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96
Number of pages109
JournalLanguage Assessment Quarterly
Issue number1
Early online date25 Feb 2013
Publication statusPublished - 25 Feb 2013

Bibliographical note

Special Issue: Integrated writing assessment (Guest Editor: Yu, G)


Dive into the research topics of 'The use of summarization tasks: some lexical and conceptual analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this