Abstract
This article focuses on the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) – the diplomatic body, consisting of representatives of WTO members, that administers the dispute settlement system. Focusing on the WTO, the article provides one perspective on the relationship between international tribunals and the political bodies that oversee the governance of such tribunals. Specifically, I argue that the DSB operates as an important ‘voice’ mechanism, which enables members to provide regular feedback to WTO adjudicators, and helps sustain the internal legitimacy of WTO adjudication. However, the DSB can also be used in ways that undermine judicial independence. In short, the DSB is a key site where the tension plays out between WTO adjudicators’ independence from members, and control by, and accountability to, members. The episodes examined in detail to develop this argument are the crisis of a generation ago over amicus curiae briefs, and the ongoing crisis over Appellate Body appointments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 820-861 |
| Number of pages | 42 |
| Journal | Journal of World Investment and Trade |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Dec 2019 |
Bibliographical note
The acceptance date for this record is provisional and based upon the month of publication for the article.Research Groups and Themes
- Centre for International Law
- Centre for Global Law and Innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body as a Voice Mechanism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr Joshua Paine
- University of Bristol Law School - Associate Professor in International Law
Person: Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver