Abstract
Following the election of the British government in May 1997, a policy document outlining proposals to improve the health of the nation was published. This document placed a major emphasis on reducing inequalities in health and recognised the continuing poor state of oral health in deprived communities. However, whilst acknowledging the benefits of water fluoridation as a caries preventive measure, the Department of Health suggested that most of the research had been carried out some years ago and furthermore, recognised that strong views were held both for and against fluoridation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 495-7 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | British Dental Journal |
| Volume | 192 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Publication status | Published - 11 May 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Cariostatic Agents
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- DMF Index
- Dental Caries
- Fluoridation
- Fluorides
- Fluorosis, Dental
- Great Britain
- Health Policy
- Hip Fractures
- Humans
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Neoplasms
- Public Policy
- Research Design
- Safety
- Social Class
- Statistics as Topic
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The York review--a systematic review of public water fluoridation: a commentary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver