Abstract
Third-party interventions may regulate conflicts to reduce aggression and promote cohesion amongst group members, but are rarely documented in ungulates. The white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) lives in mixed-sex herds of hundreds of individuals in Neotropical forests, which are likely to benefit from mechanisms that sustain social cohesiveness. We examined third-party conflict interventions between individuals in captive groups of white-lipped peccaries. During a period of 60 days, we recorded agonistic interactions and occurrences of third-party conflict interventions, and estimated the genetic relatedness between the individuals involved using multilocus microsatellite genotypes. Most third-party conflict interventions were by the dominant male of each group, resulting in conflict termination 100% of the time. Our results also revealed that white-lipped peccaries favour their closest relatives and that individuals showed lower levels of aggression towards kin than to non-kin, and interventions on behalf of kin were more frequent than on behalf of non-kin. Our findings support the idea that genetic relatedness is fundamental in both social structure and third-party conflict interventions in this species, allowing us to suggest that kin selection could have a key role in the evolution of social behaviour of white-lipped peccaries.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 104524 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Behavioural Processes |
Volume | 193 |
Early online date | 27 Sept 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was funded by the Bahia Research Foundation (FAPESB) (Process # 0561/2015 to DEL); received a grants from Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) (Funding code 001 to FGM, Processes #88881.119854/2016–01 to SSCN, and #88881.119838/2016-01 to SLGNF); Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Processes #303448/2009-9 to SSCN, #04226/2019-0 to SLGNF, and #479760/2012–8 to CB); São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) (Process #2015/20133-0 to CB); and UK BBSRC Brazil Partnering Award (Process BB/R021112/1 ; PI: M. Mendl).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.