Abstract
Threat modeling is one of the foundations of secure systems engineering and must take heed of the context within which systems operate. In this work, we explore the extent to which real-world systems engineering reflects a changing threat context. We examine the desktop clients of six widely used end-to-end-encrypted mobile messaging applications to understand the extent to which they adjusted their threat model over space (when enabling clients on new platforms, such as desktop clients) and time (as new threats emerged). We experimented with short-lived adversarial access against these desktop clients and analyzed the results using two popular threat elicitation frameworks, STRIDE and LINDDUN. The results demonstrate that system designers need to track threats in the evolving context within which systems operate and, more importantly, mitigate them by rescoping trust boundaries so that they remain consistent with administrative boundaries. A nuanced understanding of the relationship between trust and administration is vital for robust security, including the provision of safe defaults.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2316-2335 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Software: practice and experience |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 12 |
Early online date | 22 May 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Authors. Software: Practice and Experience published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.