Three Arterial Grafts Improve Late Survival: A Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Matched Studies

Mario Gaudino*, John D. Puskas, Antonino Di Franco, Lucas B. Ohmes, Mario Iannaccone, Umberto Barbero, David Glineur, Juan B. Grau, Umberto Benedetto, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Fiorenzo Gaita, Leonard N. Girardi, David P. Taggart

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)
242 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

Little evidence shows whether a third arterial graft provides superior outcomes compared with the use of 2 arterial grafts in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. A meta-analysis of all the propensity score-matched observational studies comparing the long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of 2-arterial versus 3-arterial grafts was performed.

Methods: 

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify relevant articles. Long-term mortality in the propensity score-matched populations was the primary end point. Secondary end points were in-hospital/30-day mortality for the propensity score-matched populations and long-term mortality for the unmatched populations. In the matched population, time-to-event outcome for long-term mortality was extracted as hazard ratios, along with their variance. Statistical pooling of survival (time-to-event) was performed according to a random effect model, computing risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals. 

Results: 

Eight propensity score-matched studies reporting on 10 287 matched patients (2-arterial graft: 5346; 3-arterial graft: 4941) were selected for final comparison. The mean follow-up time ranged from 37.2 to 196.8 months. The use of 3 arterial grafts was not statistically associated with early mortality (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.22; P=0.62). The use of 3 arterial grafts was associated with statistically significantly lower hazard for late death (hazard ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.87; P<0.001), irrespective of sex and diabetic mellitus status. This result was qualitatively similar in the unmatched population (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.98; P=0.04). 

Conclusions: 

The use of a third arterial conduit in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting is not associated with higher operative risk and is associated with superior long-term survival, irrespective of sex and diabetic mellitus status.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1036-1044
Number of pages9
JournalCirculation
Volume135
Issue number11
Early online date24 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Mar 2017

Keywords

  • bilateral internal thoracic arteries
  • radial artery
  • total arterial revascularization

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Three Arterial Grafts Improve Late Survival: A Meta-Analysis of Propensity-Matched Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this