Abstract
“Partition is a productive space,” Pakistani curator Hammad Nasar opined optimistically in the catalogue for his exhibition, “Lines of Control” in 2012. His statement appears to echo postcolonial theorist Homi K. Bhabha’s declarations about the productivity of thresholds, lines and borders. This essay discusses modern and contemporary art and exhibitions in the context of this statement. Bhabha, of course, makes much of the generative properties of borderlines – exploring how the dividing line reappears in all of them as a double-gesture: both as a symbol of conflict as well as a sign of creative virtuosity. This is the promise that such exhibitions and hopeful cultural theorists pin their hopes on. Hence, this essay seeks to discover if p/Partition as an artistic and intellectual motif is really a “productive space” – and if so, on what basis? The text pays attention to the implications of using political motifs as creative inspiration for art exhibitions and theoretical musings – with critical concentration on the ‘borderline’ cogitations of Bhabha.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The 1947 Partition of British India |
Subtitle of host publication | Forced Migrations and Its Reverberations |
Editors | Jennifer Leaning, Shubhangi Bhadada |
Publisher | SAGE Publications India |
Chapter | 10 |
Pages | 279-313 |
Number of pages | 34 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 978-93-5479-320-2 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-93-5479-290-8 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2022 |
Keywords
- South Asian art
- Politics
- Trauma
- British India
- Partition
- Migrations