Abstract
Time series of displacement are now routinely available from satellite InSAR and are used for flagging anomalous ground motion, but not yet forecasting. We test conventional time series forecasting methods such as SARIMA and supervised machine learning approaches such as long short-term memory (LSTM) compared to simple function extrapolation. We focus initially on forecasting seasonal signals and begin by characterizing the time-series using sinusoid fitting, seasonal decomposition, and autocorrelation functions. We find that the three measures are broadly comparable but identify different types of seasonal characteristic. We use this to select a set of 310 points with highly seasonal characteristics and test the three chosen forecasting methods over prediction windows of 1–9 months. The lowest overall median RMSE values are obtained for SARIMA when considering short term predictions (<1 month), whereas sinusoid extrapolation produces the lowest median RMSE values for longer predictions (>6 months). Machine learning methods (LSTM) perform less well. We then test the prediction methods on 2,000 randomly selected points with a range of seasonalities and find that simple extrapolation of a constant function performed better overall than any of the more sophisticated time series prediction methods. Comparisons between seasonality and RMSE show a small improvement in performance with increasing seasonality. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the potential of time-series prediction for InSAR data but also highlights the limitations of applying these techniques to nonperiodic signals or individual measurement points. We anticipate future developments, especially to shorter timescales, will have a broad range of potential applications, from infrastructure stability to volcanic eruptions.
Key Points
- We test established time series prediction methods on 4 years of Sentinel-1 InSAR data and investigate the role of seasonality
- For seasonal signals, SARIMA and machine learning (LSTM) perform best over <3 months and sinusoid extrapolation over >6 months
- Forecast quality decreases for less seasonal signals, and a constant value prediction performs best for randomly selected datapoints
Key Points
- We test established time series prediction methods on 4 years of Sentinel-1 InSAR data and investigate the role of seasonality
- For seasonal signals, SARIMA and machine learning (LSTM) perform best over <3 months and sinusoid extrapolation over >6 months
- Forecast quality decreases for less seasonal signals, and a constant value prediction performs best for randomly selected datapoints
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth |
| Volume | 126 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 26 Jan 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Mar 2021 |
Bibliographical note
The acceptance date for this record is provisional and based upon the month of publication for the article.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Time-series Prediction Approaches to Forecasting Deformation in Sentinel-1 Insar Data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver