Skip to content

To move or not to move: mobility decision-making in the context of welfare conditionality and paid employment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)596-611
Number of pages16
Issue number5
DateAccepted/In press - 1 Jul 2019
DatePublished (current) - 18 Jul 2019


The mobility and agency of the unemployed have rarely been examined together in welfare administration. Mobility research has much to offer the (im)mobility of low-skilled and unemployed workers. The article begins by critically examining dominant public discourse and policy reforms that stigmatise the assumed immobility of the unemployed. Drawing on empirical data from in-depth interviews with people on income support payments in Australia, it then offers a critical view on the mobility decision-making processes of these job-seekers. Building on previous research concerning the politics of mobility, it shows that structural inequalities impact mobility choices, making relocation difficult for many job-seekers. At the same time, it highlights the localised mobility that job search now involves, complicating orthodox associations between mobility and power–as well as assumptions that job-seekers are immobile.

    Research areas

  • Australia, immobility, income support, Mobility, unemployment, welfare conditionality

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Taylor and Francis at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 1.83 MB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY-NC-ND


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups