Skip to content

Towards deliberative and pragmatic co-management: a comparison between inshore fisheries authorities in England and Scotland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Towards deliberative and pragmatic co-management : a comparison between inshore fisheries authorities in England and Scotland. / Pieraccini, Margherita; Cardwell, Emma.

In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 25, No. 4, 03.07.2016, p. 729-748.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{a7f2a39daeef44cca79740e35a2ba27f,
title = "Towards deliberative and pragmatic co-management: a comparison between inshore fisheries authorities in England and Scotland",
abstract = "In seeking to answer the question ‘who should be included in fisheries co-management?’, a constructive critique of the existing co-management literature is provided by filling the gaps of Habermas’s deliberative theory of democracy with Dewey’s pragmatism. Three conditions for ensuring democratic co-management are extrapolated from the theories: actors’ authority over decision making (empowerment), actors’ diversity (membership), and the right to self-nomination (procedures for external inclusion). The theoretical insights developed are supported with two examples of co-management institutions for inshore fisheries in the UK: Scottish Inshore Fisheries Groups (IFGs) and English Inshore Fisheries Conservation Authorities (IFCAs).",
keywords = "Procedural justice, co-management, deliberative theories, inshore fisheries institutions",
author = "Margherita Pieraccini and Emma Cardwell",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09644016.2015.1090372",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "729--748",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards deliberative and pragmatic co-management

T2 - a comparison between inshore fisheries authorities in England and Scotland

AU - Pieraccini, Margherita

AU - Cardwell, Emma

PY - 2016/7/3

Y1 - 2016/7/3

N2 - In seeking to answer the question ‘who should be included in fisheries co-management?’, a constructive critique of the existing co-management literature is provided by filling the gaps of Habermas’s deliberative theory of democracy with Dewey’s pragmatism. Three conditions for ensuring democratic co-management are extrapolated from the theories: actors’ authority over decision making (empowerment), actors’ diversity (membership), and the right to self-nomination (procedures for external inclusion). The theoretical insights developed are supported with two examples of co-management institutions for inshore fisheries in the UK: Scottish Inshore Fisheries Groups (IFGs) and English Inshore Fisheries Conservation Authorities (IFCAs).

AB - In seeking to answer the question ‘who should be included in fisheries co-management?’, a constructive critique of the existing co-management literature is provided by filling the gaps of Habermas’s deliberative theory of democracy with Dewey’s pragmatism. Three conditions for ensuring democratic co-management are extrapolated from the theories: actors’ authority over decision making (empowerment), actors’ diversity (membership), and the right to self-nomination (procedures for external inclusion). The theoretical insights developed are supported with two examples of co-management institutions for inshore fisheries in the UK: Scottish Inshore Fisheries Groups (IFGs) and English Inshore Fisheries Conservation Authorities (IFCAs).

KW - Procedural justice

KW - co-management

KW - deliberative theories

KW - inshore fisheries institutions

U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2015.1090372

DO - 10.1080/09644016.2015.1090372

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 729

EP - 748

JO - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 4

ER -