Trafficking (in) Representations: Understanding the Recurrent Appeal of Victimhood and Slavery in Neoliberal Times

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issue (Academic Journal)peer-review

667 Downloads (Pure)


Representations of trafficking and forced labour are pervasive within media, policymaking, and humanitarian debates, discourses and interventions. The terms exploitation and trafficking are increasingly used to characterise the work that migrants do in the sex industry and other irregular employment sectors. Of late, the notion of ‘modern slavery’ is on show in campaigns aiming to raise awareness about trafficking and funds for anti-trafficking initiatives among corporations and local enterprises as well as the general public. Celebrity interventions, militant documentaries, artistic works and fiction films have all become powerful vectors of the global distribution of the trafficking and ‘modern slavery’ rhetoric. These offer simplistic solutions to complex issues without challenging the structural and causal factors of inequality. Through fictional and narrow representations of ideal victims they tend to entrench racialised narratives and conflate all sex work with trafficking, which legitimates criminalising policies and interventions exacerbating the social vulnerability of sex workers. It is because of the under-researched role of representation in the development of anti-trafficking policies and initiatives that the Anti-Trafficking Review decided to devote a thematic issue on trafficking representations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalAnti-Trafficking Review
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 29 Sept 2016

Structured keywords

  • Gender Research Group
  • Perspectives on Work
  • Global Political Economy
  • Migration Mobilities Bristol
  • MGMT Work Organisation and Public Policy
  • MGMT theme Global Political Economy


Dive into the research topics of 'Trafficking (in) Representations: Understanding the Recurrent Appeal of Victimhood and Slavery in Neoliberal Times'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this