Transparency and Public Involvement in Animal Research

Pandora Pound, Ricardo Blaug

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

260 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To be legitimate research needs to be ethical, methodologically sound, of sufficient value to justify public expenditure, and transparent. Animal research has always been contested on ethical grounds, but there is now mounting evidence of poor scientific method, and growing doubts about its clinical
value. So what of transparency? 'Here we examine the increasing focus on openness within animal research in the UK, analysing recent developments within the Home Office and within the main group representing the interests of the sector, Understanding Animal Research. We argue that while important steps are being taken towards greater transparency, the legitimacy of animal research
continues to be undermined by selective openness. We propose that openness could be increased through public involvement and that this would bring about much needed improvements in animal research, as it has done in clinical research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)167-173
Number of pages7
JournalAlternatives to Laboratory Animals
Volume44
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

Keywords

  • Openness
  • animal research
  • transparency
  • public involvement

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Transparency and Public Involvement in Animal Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this