Abstract
Aims: To inform and guide patient-centred care for men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), by providing in-depth qualitative evidence regarding men’s perspectives on treatment decision-making for LUTS.
Methods: Interview study of men recruited from 26 English urology departments. Purposive sampling captured, surgical/non-surgical treatment decisions, and diversity in demographics and symptom burden, in men who had urodynamics and those who did not. After diagnostic assessments, men were interviewed either pre-treatment, or after LUTS surgery. Thematic analysis was conducted. Participants’ descriptions of how LUTS treatment decisions were made were categorised as patient-led, doctor-led, or shared.
Results: 41 men participated (25 pre-treatment, 16 post-surgery), ages 52-89. 20/41 described the treatment decision as shared with their consultant, 14 as doctor-led, and 7 as patient-led. There was no obvious association between treatment decision-making style and patients’ satisfaction with either clinicians’ role in their decision or their treatment decision. Incomplete or rushed discussions and misperceptions of LUTS and its treatment were reported, indicating a risk of suboptimal decision-making support by clinicians. As well as clinician opinion, men’s treatment decision-making was influenced by the results of urological assessments, comparing current symptoms with possible side-effects of surgery, and others’ experiences and opinions.
Conclusions: Men with LUTS report and prefer different kinds of decision-making support from their clinicians, who must tailor their input to patients’ preferences and needs. Patients’ treatment decision-making involves multiple factors and can be challenging, and areas of inadequate clinician support were identified. Recommendations for patient-centred consultations about LUTS treatment are presented.
Methods: Interview study of men recruited from 26 English urology departments. Purposive sampling captured, surgical/non-surgical treatment decisions, and diversity in demographics and symptom burden, in men who had urodynamics and those who did not. After diagnostic assessments, men were interviewed either pre-treatment, or after LUTS surgery. Thematic analysis was conducted. Participants’ descriptions of how LUTS treatment decisions were made were categorised as patient-led, doctor-led, or shared.
Results: 41 men participated (25 pre-treatment, 16 post-surgery), ages 52-89. 20/41 described the treatment decision as shared with their consultant, 14 as doctor-led, and 7 as patient-led. There was no obvious association between treatment decision-making style and patients’ satisfaction with either clinicians’ role in their decision or their treatment decision. Incomplete or rushed discussions and misperceptions of LUTS and its treatment were reported, indicating a risk of suboptimal decision-making support by clinicians. As well as clinician opinion, men’s treatment decision-making was influenced by the results of urological assessments, comparing current symptoms with possible side-effects of surgery, and others’ experiences and opinions.
Conclusions: Men with LUTS report and prefer different kinds of decision-making support from their clinicians, who must tailor their input to patients’ preferences and needs. Patients’ treatment decision-making involves multiple factors and can be challenging, and areas of inadequate clinician support were identified. Recommendations for patient-centred consultations about LUTS treatment are presented.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Neurourology and Urodynamics |
| Early online date | 14 Oct 2020 |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 14 Oct 2020 |
Research Groups and Themes
- UPSTREAM
- Palliative and End of Life Care
Keywords
- Decision Making
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
- Patient-Centered Care
- Patient Preference
- Qualitative Research
- Transurethral Resection of Prostate
- Urodynamics
- Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male